ICRC Launches Customary Humanitarian Law Database

The International Committee for the Red Cross has launched its Customary International Humanitarian Law Database, and it is a huge time waster. Or huge time-saver, I guess, if your work actually involves IHL, but for me it’s pretty much just a shiny new method of procrastination.

This thing is seriously comprehensive — it’s the best free resource on Customary International Law I can think of, and the database is pretty much idiot-proof to navigate. In addition to looking at the practice records of particular countries, you can also look at a listing of the state practice for any given IHL rule. The ICRC has listed of 161 identified norms of customary international law relating to humanitarian law, and provides the practice in support thereof for reach. (The rules are not intended to be a comprehensive listing of all of customary humanitarian law: “As the approach chosen [by the ICRC] does not analyse each treaty provision with a view to establishing whether or not it is customary, it cannot be concluded that any particular treaty rule is not customary merely because it does not appear as such in this study”. But the ICRC does not seem to have missed much.)

For instance, take ICRC’s Rule 86 of IHL: The use of laser weapons that are specifically designed, as their sole combat function or as one of their combat functions, to cause permanent blindness to unenhanced vision is prohibited.

This would normally be a somewhat difficult norm of CIL to research, in part because it is one of those “accelerated CIL norms” that has come into being rather recently and rather abruptly, and in part because it’s a norm of CIL that states have not really had an opportunity to violate in the first place. To quote China’s statements upon the adoption of Protocol IV to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, “this is the first time in human history that a kind of inhumane weapon is declared illegal and prohibited before it is actually used.” So it could take a bit of digging to determine if there truly is CIL prohibiting the use of blinding lasers … or if nations simply haven’t developed the technology to implement such weapons, yet, and therefore the total absence of state practice refuting the norm is meaningless.

But as it turns out, there is actually vastly more examples of state practice behind the norm than I would have guessed. If any domestic or international tribunal wanted proof that such a norm of IHL genuinely existed and was actually accepted as law by the world’s nations, they wouldn’t need to look much further.

A database like this ought to exist for all of customary international law. The difficulty, of course, is in ensuring that the database administrator is operating from a neutral and objective standpoint, diligently compiling incidents of conformance and non-conformance with alleged CIL norms. From what I’ve seen so far, the ICRC’s database of IHL does a good job of that, but it would be far too easy for a database to selectively include or exclude particular examples of state practice to create a warped view of how robust the norm truly is.


4 thoughts on “ICRC Launches Customary Humanitarian Law Database

  1. The annual meeting of the US-India Defense Policy Group, co-chaired by Under Secretary of Defense (Policy) Flournoy and Defence Secretary Kumar, just concluded a few days ago. When the India-US Defense Policy Group met in 2008, the Bush Administration and the UPA government concluded a historic agreement to allow joint US-India operations in Arunachal Pradesh for the sole purpose of recovering the remains of US airmen lost there during World War II. But since the Obama Administration has come to power, President Obama and PM Singh have apparently decided that it it’s best to kowtow to Chinese pressure to cancel these operations. Shame on the UPA government, the Obama Administration, and the Chinese regime for violating their obligations under the Geneva Conventions to return the bodies of these brave men to their heartbroken families for proper burial.

  2. Howdy fantastic website! Does running a blog such as this require a large
    amount of work? I’ve very littlee understanding of programming but I had been hoping to start my ownn blog in the
    near future. Anyway, should you have anny recommendations or tips for new blog
    owners please share. I knmow tthis is off subject nevertheless I simpply had
    too ask. Cheers!

  3. They are seen as a source of information provided by Internet users across the world.
    Internet has successfully provided employment to many.
    The articles that you produce with article marketing
    are commonly known as ‘free reprint articles’, this is because online publishers are able to republish them online free of charge.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s